![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidation Supporters Rationalize Their Position
IRONWOOD, MI - Sunday, August 03, 2008 - Petitions are being circulated in an attempt to have the issue of consolidation brought before the voters in the November 4, 2008 General Election. Based on a fact sheet provided to the Chronicle, reasons for consolidation include (1) Declining Population, represented in the chart above; (2) Better Curricular/Academic Offerings for all Schools; (3) Better Extra-Curricular Offerings for all Schools; and (4) Cost Savings. Declining Population - As demonstrated in the chart above, all three school systems are suffering from a declining population, and projections for the future aren't showing any reversal of that trend. Better Curricular/Academic Offerings for ALL Schools - Individual schools cannot offer seperately what could be offered jointly. These classes could be offered every year, rather than evey other year or every third year. Keep in mind, classes would not need to be limited to the following list:
Better Extra-Curricular Offerings for ALL Schools - Individual schools cannot offer separately what could be offered together.
Cost Savings - Here is a partial list of the cost savings that could be realized through consolidation:
What Happens to Each District's Debt? (Bonded Indebtedness) - According to the Revised School Code Act 451of 1976 "The assumption of bonded indebtedness of one or more of the districts; or an increase in the operating millage rate must be included in the petition and ballot question." This petition drive and the ballot question does not include this language, so the consolidated school district, if successful, will not assume the bonded indebtedness of the individual school districts. Those districts will continue to be responsible for their own debts. For Informational Purposes Only: Bessemer Area's boneded indebtedness totals $1,948,808:
Ironwood Area's bonded indebtedness totals $3,110,000:
Wakefield-Marenisco's bonded indebtedness is $2,150,000:
Considering that Ironwood's taxable base is $145M; Bessemer's is $57M; and Wakefield-Marenisco's is 89M, the cost per taxpayer is higher in Bessemer that in Ironwood, currently. For more information or to sign the petition call Bob Burchell at (906) 932-2000.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||