![]() |
How Does the Blueprint Plan Differ from Previously Purchased City Plans?
IRONWOOD, MI - Saturday, July 19, 2008 - This week the State of Michigan selected the City of Ironwood to be one of six Michigan cities to receive this year's Blueprints for Michigan Cities. The project will cost the City $15,000. The total cost of the project will be $30,000. All of which is ultimately paid by Michigan taxpayers. For this $15,000, the City will receive a plan -- a market analysis, course of action, an economic vision, a "blueprint" or any other name you might want to call it. The project does nothing to help implement the plan. Currently wedged on a bookshelf in the Community Development Conference Room at the Memorial Building are three similar plans the City paid to create in the past -- one from the 1970's, one from 1981, and one from 1990. The 1981 plan cost the City over $80,000. The 1990 plan was essentially free, since it was merely an update of the 1981 done by that era's DIDA. One of the arguments made for supporting the Blueprints for Michigan Cities program was the low cost. Certainly $15,000 is considerably lower than $80,000, but the real question is this... What makes anyone think that a 2008 plan will suddenly be effective when virtually nothing ever came of the three decades of plans that have remained on a shelf since their creation? Will the 2008 guide simply join the "dead plan" library or will the ideas and suggestions in the plan be implemented by the City? Another question one needs to ask is this... "Once the Blueprint Plan is complete, where is the City going to get the funds to put the plan into play?" It was suggested that the Plan would open the doors to grants offered by the State. Shouldn't the State be helping its failing Downtowns without first requiring blood money? The Blueprints from several Michigan cities can be found on line. The cookie cutter plans seem to be nearly identical from city to city. Several of the different cities' Blueprints can be view through the links below:
Each of Blueprints follow the same 8-point outline:
Evidently, not every city that enrolled in the Blueprint Program was completely convinced that it was a good investment. The Big Rapids Blueprint features a "sales pitch" to assure them that this plan is different than previous plans the city invested in.
Downtown Ironwood has gone from thriving in the 50's, 60's and '70's to suffering in the 2000's. Plan after plan has done nothing to improve things. They were simply a waste of valuable resources. The Downtown Ironwood Development Authority has a very limited budget. So does the City of Ironwood. Perhaps there is better use for the taxpayers $15,000 than to purchase yet another plan. Jim Albert |